Dynamics of the D+ + H2 and H+ + D2 reactions: a detailed comparison between theory and experiment
文献信息
J. M. Alvariño, D. Gerlich, M. Hankel, V. J. Herrero, V. Sáez-Rábanos, F. J. Aoiz
An extensive set of experimental measurements on the dynamics of the H+ + D2 and D+ + H2 ion–molecule reactions is compared with the results of quantum mechanical (QM), quasiclassical trajectory (QCT), and statistical quasiclassical trajectory (SQCT) calculations. The dynamical observables considered include specific rate coefficients as a function of the translational energy, ET, thermal rate coefficients in the 100–500 K temperature range. In addition, kinetic energy spectra (KES) of the D+ ions reactively scattered in H+ + D2 collisions are also presented for translational energies between 0.4 eV and 2.0 eV. For the two reactions, the best global agreement between experiment and theory over the whole energy range corresponds to the QCT calculations using a Gaussian binning (GB) procedure, which gives more weight to trajectories whose product vibrational action is closer to the actual integer QM values. The QM calculations also perform well, although somewhat worse over the more limited range of translational energies where they are available (ET < 0.6 eV and ET < 0.2 eV for the H+ + D2 and D+ + H2 reactions, respectively). The worst agreement is obtained with the SQCT method, which is only adequate for low translational energies. The comparison between theory and experiment also suggests that the most reliable rate coefficient measurements are those obtained with the merged beams technique. It is worth noting that none of the theoretical approaches can account satisfactorily for the experimental specific rate coefficients of H+ + D2 for ET ≤ 0.2 eV although there is a considerable scatter in the existing measurements. On the whole, the best agreement with the experimental laboratory KES is obtained with the simulations carried out using the state resolved differential cross sections (DCSs) calculated with the QCT-GB method, which seems to account for most of the observed features. In contrast, the simulations with the SQCT data predict kinetic energy spectra (KES) considerably cooler than those experimentally determined.
相关文献
Efficient nickel catalyst for coupling of acetonitrile with aldehydes
Lei Fan, Oleg. V. Ozerov
DOI: 10.1039/B505778G
Photoinduced charge separation and charge recombination of fullerene bearing dendritic poly(amidoamine) with carboxylates at the terminal in aqueous media
Yutaka Takaguchi, Yuuki Sako, Mitsuhiro Tamura
DOI: 10.1039/B508793G
Substituent effects on the structure and supramolecular assembly of bis(dioxaborole)s
Weijun Niu, Brett Rambo, Mark D. Smith, John J. Lavigne
DOI: 10.1039/B507475D
Design and synthesis of artificial phospholipid for selective cleavage of integral membrane protein
Takumi Furuta, Minatsu Sakai, Hiroyasu Hayashi, Tomohiro Asakawa, Fumi Kataoka, Satoshi Fujii, Takashi Suzuki, Yasuo Suzuki, Kiyoshi Tanaka, Nathan Fishkin, Koji Nakanishi
DOI: 10.1039/B507917A
Organocatalytic asymmetric α-bromination of aldehydes and ketones
Søren Bertelsen, Nis Halland, Stephan Bachmann, Mauro Marigo, Alan Braunton, Karl Anker Jørgensen
DOI: 10.1039/B509366J
A novel and facile Zn-mediated intramolecular five-membered cyclization of β-tetraarylporphyrin radicals from β-bromotetraarylporphyrins
Dong-Mei Shen, Chao Liu, Qing-Yun Chen
DOI: 10.1039/B509972B
Concomitant crystallization of two polymorphs—a ring and a helix: concentration effect on supramolecular isomerism
Katharina M. Fromm, Jorge L. Sagué Doimeadios, Adeline Y. Robin
DOI: 10.1039/B506389B
Structure and magnetic properties of a new ferrimagnet containing a paramagnetic [Cr(CN)5(NO)]3− building block
Wei Zhang, Kazuyoshi Yoshimura, Yan Ouyang, Zong-Hui Jiang, Shi-Ping Yan, Peng Cheng
DOI: 10.1039/B506465A
Structural and EPR characterisation of single electron and alkyl transfer products from reaction of dimethyl magnesium with bulky α-diimine ligands‡
Philip J. Bailey, Robert A. Coxall, Caroline M. Dick, Sylvie Fabre, Simon Parsons, Lesley J. Yellowlees
DOI: 10.1039/B505697G
您可能还喜欢
(3-氨苯基)环丙基甲酮(CAS号:162174-75-6)的主要用途是什么?
(3-氨苯基)环丙基甲酮主要用于合成化学中间体,特别是在药物化学领域作为原料。它还可以用于有机合成反应中,作为催化剂或反应物。
如何储存亚胺菌(CAS号:136470-79-6)?
亚胺菌应储存在干燥、阴凉处,避免直接暴露于光线下。建议使用密封容器储存,防止吸潮和污染。具体的储存条件应参考产品的安全数据表(MSDS)或药品说明书。
2-氯-2,2-二氟乙酰胺(CAS号:354-28-9)应用于哪些行业?
2-氯-2,2-二氟乙酰胺在医药、聚合物、传感器、半导体等领域有广泛应用。在医药领域,它作为中间体用于合成其他药物;在聚合物领域,用作聚合引发剂或稳定剂;在传感...
处理4-甲基-3-硝基-1,1-联苯(CAS号:53812-68-3)时应注意哪些实验室安全事项?
在处理4-甲基-3-硝基-1,1-联苯时,应佩戴手套、护目镜和实验室外套等个人防护装备(PPE),确保在通风橱中操作以减少吸入风险。若发生泄露,应立即使用沙子或...
(2S)-羟基(苯基)乙酸 (2R)-N-苄基-1-(4-甲氧基苯基)丙-2-胺盐(CAS号:188690-84-8)应用于哪些行业?
该化合物广泛应用于医药、聚合物和半导体行业。在医药领域,它是某些药物中间体的重要组成部分;在聚合物领域,可用作增塑剂;在半导体行业,可用于制造光刻胶。
在合成中是否有芬苯哒唑砜-D3标准品(CAS号:1228182-49-7)的替代品?
芬苯哒唑砜-D3标准品的替代品可能包括类似的苯并咪唑类化合物,如芬苯哒唑本身或其非同位素标记版本。这些替代品在结构上与芬苯哒唑砜-D3相似,但在具体应用中需进行...
2-氟-4-硝基苯乙酸(CAS号:315228-19-4)通常如何合成?
2-氟-4-硝基苯乙酸可以通过一系列化学反应合成,通常是从4-氟苯胺开始,首先进行硝化反应生成4-氟-2-硝基苯胺,然后进行乙酰化反应得到目标产物。具体的合成步...
2-氟-4-甲氧基苯乙酸(CAS号:883531-28-0)通常如何合成?
2-氟-4-甲氧基苯乙酸通常通过将4-甲氧基苯乙酸与氟化试剂(如氟化氰)反应来合成。反应通常在无水条件下进行,使用催化剂如六氟磷酸锂或四氟硼酸锂以提高选择性和产...
什么是4SC 202;4SC202(CAS号:1186222-89-8)?
4SC 202;4SC202是一种化学化合物,其化学名称为(2E)-N-(2-氨基苯基)-3-(1-{[4-(1-甲基-1H-吡唑-4-基)苯基]磺酰基}-1H...
来源期刊
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.














